5 stars based on
First time posting, switched to Arch recently and loving gcc binary path spartan environment - in control of everything. I've already contributed a bit to the wiki I've ran MediaWiki for years on other sites. I'm having a problem trying to get the vmware tools installed. The vmware-config-tools is gcc binary path finding GCC, even though I obviously have it in my path and it works. This is preventing the vmhgfs driver from being built. It was "fun" to register for this forum, asking me to enter the shasum output for anti-spam.
Digging into the perl script it's been 20 years since I touched Perl! So when the command runs vmware-modconfig-console again specifying the gcc-path, it returns "1" as an error and the script skips vmhgfs all together. Digging a bit deeper, running ldd on the vmware-modconfig-console showed a few missing dependencies. Gcc binary path added the missing dependencies, and the output now shows all dependencies satisfied sorry, can't copy-n-paste the output gcc binary path again.
I've followed the excellent arch wiki in trying to gcc binary path things working: I added that to the kernel modules and it's there now. I went ahead and explicitly added the others just in case as well. I prefer VMs gcc binary path native installs because of my work environment. I switch from my killer tri-monitor gaming desktop to work's 30" dual monitors and between a killer laptop and a Windows tablet.
A VM works best gcc binary path to share. Gcc was found by following those directions! I tried searching a bit, but that post didn't show up. Please remember to edit your first post and add [Solved] to the beginning of the thread title when you regard gcc binary path it as solved. Nothing is too wonderful to be true, if it be consistent with the laws of gcc binary path -- Michael Faraday Sometimes it is the people no one can imagine anything of who do the things no one can imagine.
Gcc binary path, is there a reason to compile the gcc binary path with 5. I mean, is there a reason to risk the setup of several users? Be careful when enabling the testing repository. Your system may break after performing an update. Only experienced users who know how to deal with potential system breakage should use it. I am not sure if the people reading this know how to deal with "potential system breakage". Because gcc binary path kernel is in the Core repo.
Everything in Core has to go through Testing. When it was built against Testing, gcc 5. Okay I just tried it. I was happy to early the vm library opens but as soon as I want to start a vm the wm crashes. I continue to get build errors related to inode. The Ubuntu guys found that it is related to gcc binary path latest kernel update from around Feb I patched my inode.
Feeling like I am going down a deep rabbit hole again, I went to the old "VMware Patch" repo on github and pulled it down:. Given most of these expect a Debian base to run from, I ran the patches manually and most were patched up.
Problem is, the VM hard-locks when it attempted gcc binary path start the "Guest filesystem driver", aka "vmhgfs.
Ok, system loads now and lsmod shows vmhgfs loaded; but, anytime I attempt to mount a share the entire VM hard locks again. I myself and wondering why the kernel was built with a newer gcc than is available through pacman.
Doesn't seem like a good "test" of packages if you have to upgrade the kernel itself with a newer gcc compiler to get them to work. It is related to backporting of the latest 3. They are on two different release schedules, and there is no ETA. Guess I'll go the Samba route for now and push on since my gcc 5. I like how Arch just uses the latest kernel - no backporting.
At least, that is what it looks like gcc binary path me from my newbie perspective. If you don't want to run testing, the only option is to recompile the kernel proper with gcc 4.
You can use ABS for that. Yep, recompiling the kernel seems to be the most straight forward approach on my 4. This allows you to continue to stay on Arch tip pacman -Syu. If another kernel update comes out, you can still boot from your custom kernel - and make a new custom kernel if a new one does come out. Though it must be noted that VMware Tools, the latest edition as of this post 9. I posted why above: Therefore, to get VMware tools compiled you have to use the ye ol' "Community Patches" procedure to patch up VMware tools before you run it:.
Gcc binary path baffles me is that Arch seems to have a little more than half of the VMware Modules compiled and included with the Core! Attempting to overwrite those will error in the patch scripts. Better to skip gcc binary path "shell scripts" they have in that patch repo and do them yourself manually with just the gcc binary path. The scripts were written for Debian-based systems sudo apt-get install anyone? Without this, vmware-user will not load, file sharing will not be enabled, etc.
I can run vmware-vmblock-fuse manually, create mount points according to the systemd scripts I find on Debian systems. But still nothing happens. I believe I had the bootloader set right, as I built my own kernel and did the same mods to the bootloader and gcc binary path able to boot from that custom kernel. Quick recap over the past 8 days Gcc binary path is to patch the perl scripts with the repo noted above.
All attempts to compile vmhgfs with upgraded testing versions of gcc fail when actually gcc binary path them would hard lock the actual VM.
Resolution is to re-compile the current kernel using the actual gcc on the system. Make sure to install the headers from the recompilation as well. See notes above as well. I've added that information to the main Arch wiki on "Installing Arch as a guest" page. That's on the VMware Tools' devs and also Arch devs to match gcc version with kernel! Index Rules Search Register Login. You are not logged in.
The pach "" is not valid path to the gcc binary. Would you like to change it? Don't worry, gcc 5. Has anybody tried to use LTS kernel? This should work I guess Last edited by manuelschneid3r Feeling like I am going down a deep rabbit hole again, I went to the old "VMware Patch" repo on github and pulled it down: I was able to build vmhgfs successfully and it created the vmhgfs. I would appreciate any additional help.
Last edited by eduncan Therefore, to get VMware tools compiled you have to use the ye ol' "Community Patches" procedure to patch up Gcc binary path tools before you run it: Still working on that Atom topic feed Powered by FluxBB.